Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: Magic on Muggles/ Squibs

  1. #11
    Wizengamot Ravenclaw
    You idiot! Always playing the Hero!
    OliveOil_Med's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    My fanfiction notebook broke!
    Posts
    1,547
    I imagine brooms would work much like wands do. They are magical objects in and of themselves, but they require a witch or wizard who can use their own magic as a channel in order to use the objects to their full potential. I believe J.K. has said in interviews, were a Muggle to attempt to use a wand, the results could either be miniscule or detrimental (think like in the wand scene in the first movie), but they wouldn't be able to use the object to the same extent that a wizard could.

    I would think that if a Muggle were to try and use a broom, either it wouldn't work or it would take off flying without the passager...or with them hanging by three fingers and being dragged through the canopy of a forest or the rooftops of a city. Which do you think would be more painful?

    Brand New Story!

    Banner by lullaby_BANG. Completely awesome avi came from here!

    My brand new trailer for Snape Didn't Die by thegirllikeme to serve as a constant source of inspiration whilst I write!

  2. #12
    the_weird_one
    Guest
    Ooh! Rooftops! *came from Death thread*

    Quote Originally Posted by Molly
    In terms of wands, I think J.K. has said in interviews that if a Muggle were to wield a wand, more or less anything could happen. Wands act as a channel for projects magic in a much more focused way, but wands are a magical object. But because Muggles don't have magic, they have no way of controlling the magical properties of a wand, pretty much anything could happen.
    It sounds like, in that post, that wizards have magic more apt for controlling the wand, rather than actually channeling their magic to use it. Anyone agree in this theory? I think not. And then we'll get into magical genes and such, but in short, let's just say I believe that wizards have the gene of magic, which means they can perform it from themselves, as per case as magic without wands. Okay. Just wanted to clear that up.

    As for Muggles on broomsticks, I don't think that the broom works in the same way a wand does, it is more physical than meta-physcial, which is what wands use, because, in theory, they tap inside a person's magical ability to produce physical magic. Since the broom shows no indication of doing this (tapping inside a person for it's power) I would assume that it would work the same for a Muggle, maybe going a little haywire. Because the broom is an enchanted magical object, (that is, it was once a regular broom) it has different properties than a wand. I'd like to think of it as an iPod touch and a camera you improvised to play music. The camera can loose the music-playing file, as the iPod touch cannot, because it is permanently programmed into the device. I'm sure it can be removed in some special way, but it's really meant to play music, isn't it? Compare this to a wand and a broom. You can take the magic out the wand, but you can't take the wand out of the magic. Try to get it, okay?

    But getting back to the original topic-- yes, most magic can work on Muggles, again, they didn't perform the magic themselves. Okay. Good.

    -Addy

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •