How do you think Umbridge would react if during her reign as High Inquisiter and Headmistress, an epidemic of a diease of a somewhat sensitive nature took hold of the student body? It turns out to be just a elaborate prank by the Weasley twins, but all the same, it could mean her job and position, as well as her image in the media.
What would her reaction would be once the epidemic first took hold? What would she be willing to do to keep the outside public from finding out? What would her reactin be upon finding out the entire event was a stunt (keep in mind, it wasn't the student's fault, although she may not see it that way. It was purely the Weasley twins)?




Reply With Quote
=Sammy
One person made a very convincing argument for Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader being a "bad Gryffindor," with the bravery totally misdirected, and Han Solo being a "good Slytherin" (you know, as in Luke's line "Take care of yourself, Han. It's the one thing that you're good at." Or something like that.) I agree that Umbridge seems to lack both bravery and a regard for the intellect, so Gryffindor and Ravenclaw are probably out. But if she really does have a blind loyalty to the minister and not just a craving for power by being around the powerful, she could possibly be a "bad Hufflepuff" in the way that Anakin Skywalker could be a bad Gryffindor.
and then had some major event that turned her into such a troll. OK, done being devil's advocate and defender of Slytherin. 
