
Originally Posted by
Elmindreda
So anyway, the Apparition explanation
is technically plausible, and sorry for being the nitpicky canon freak that I am.

Don't apologise to *me*! You have very good points. It's one of those myriad consistency issues. I was just trying to mash it all together into something plausible. 

Originally Posted by
Elmindreda
Possible answer - maybe even Snape doesn't know everything (however shocking the notion

).
Oh, he *clearly* doesn't. I really *don't* think he had any idea Pettigrew was a Death Eater.

Originally Posted by
Elmindreda
Although I still doubt whether Voldemort would have his own mark...
2) From a personality POV, I think he would eagerly brand his followers for his own, but to have a brand himself would be, on a certain level, equating himself with them, even if it was a 'Master Mark.' If anything, I could imagine it being an object, and not part of him...
But the idea of Voldemort not having any tangible marks/objects/symbols still seems to have more appeal for me personally. Like, the followers may need the marks to be recognized as his own, but he, the Lord, requires no mark, no symbol, no label to be recognized. He is known without any extra signs. For some reason, that strikes me as a rather Voldemort notion. Wishing to make himself a name that people would fear to speak. And being someone who requires no mark to be recognized.
Agreed wholeheartedly, except for then you have that problem of him having to have someone with him at all times so that whenever he wants to talk to another one, he has to Summon them all.
I don't really see him sending owls. "Dear Lucius. Please deign to grace me with your haughty aristocratic presence and if you can fit me into your schedule, I'd love to have tea with you this afternoon. Cuddles & squishies, The Dark Lord"
>__<
And we already know that none of the Death Eaters (besides Snape) can use a Patronus.